I am doing a trial run with a CGM, and although the thing is a pain in the butt it has really helped me figure out my basal rates.

My numbers have been really good lately, and they stay steady in a range of about 70-80. I am not used to this (I'm usually around 100-120), and I am wondering if perhaps I am being too aggressive in my treatment. I am also testing more than I used to to make sure that I don't slip into a low, even though I don't suffer from hypo unawareness.

What fasting numbers do the rest of you shoot for? For the fellow pumpers, what do you aim for when setting your basal rates? Is hovering around 80 dangerous?

Tags: BS, CGM, basal rate, fasting, type 1, type 2

Views: 5

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I aim to keep my numbers between 70 and 160. My aim for my fasting numbers to be between 90 and 120 during the day. I aim for closer to 110 or 120 when I go to sleep.
Hi Sara,
I don't think there is exactly a set number that we have to treat. I think it really has to do with the individual and what is going on at a specific time. I try to keep my numbers around 100 and lower all the time. I don't always manage, but work hard to do it. I can be very comfortable at 70. But there have been a couple of times when i had a reaction at 86 or 87. When you feel like you have to treat, I don't think the number should be the deciding factor. I think the way you feel should be what you base your decision on. Each if us is so different and whatever load of hormones we are carrying at a specific time affects how we react to things. I just think the best bet is to go with how you are feeling.
But some people are hypo-unaware, and can develop hypo-unawareness if they let their BG's hover too low on a regular basis. I've also had plenty of times when I feel low with a mid-80's reading, but I chalk that up to meter error since meters aren't perfect. There are plenty of folks who could get themselves into trouble if they just decided to treat when they feel low.
100 is the target.

If its lower fine won't actively prevent it... higher fine too, just keep targeting on 100.

70-80 is technically not "low" (low is 60 or lower) but unless it happened magically not sure I'd feel safe with no "wiggle room"

Stuart.
I can often feel low if I'm around 80. I think that's good considering I've been diabetic for so long. I don't want to develop hypo-unawareness, and letting your BG's hover too low will lead to that. I prefer 90-110 BG's. I don't like when my BG gets into the 50's or 60's before I feel my low. That's just looking for trouble, and if you decide to be OK with a 70 or 80, that's bound to happen. So it's not being at 70 that's dangerous, it's what it does to your own hypo-awareness and since your body can't self-regulate, it may not take much for that 70 to become 40 or 50 or lower before you have a chance to even realize it.
I don't treat unless I'm below 70. I feel best at 80-90 fasting, but I think I was hypoglycemic for years without knowing it & my body must have gotten used to lows. In those days, I'd get ravenously hungry & eat three candy bars to feel normal again.

If below 60, I get foggy & my hands shake. I worry about hypo unawareness because of years of probably being hypo, so test a lot.

I try to be around 100-110 before going to bed.

RSS

Advertisement



REsources

From the Diabetes Hands Foundation blog...

Together, We Can Get Diabetes Co-Stars to 10,000 Views!

Above is a photo of Diabetes Hands Foundation’s own Manny Hernandez with the stars of the Diabetes Co-Stars Video, “Strength in Numbers.” In case you haven’t heard the news yet, there is a new video making it’s way through the …
Continue Reading

Congratulations Diabetes Advocates Scholarship Recipients!

The Diabetes Hands Foundation and Diabetes Advocates Program is proud to announce and congratulate the members of DA who were granted scholarships to attend diabetes conferences in 2013! Thanks to a generous grant from Novo Nordisk, in 2013 we were …
Continue Reading

TuDiabetes Team

DHF STAFF

Manny Hernandez
(Co-Founder, Editor, has LADA)

Emily Coles
(Head of Communities, has type 1)

Emily Walton
(Business Manager)

Mike Lawson
(Head of Experience, has type 1)

Corinna Cornejo
(Development Manager, has type 2)

Heather Gabel
(Administrative and Programs Assistant, has type 1)

DHF VOLUNTEERS


Lead Administrator
Bradford (has type 1)

Administrators
Lorraine (mother of type 1)
Marie B (has type 1)

Teena (has type 2)

Brian (bsc) (has type 2)

jrtpup (has type 1)

 

LIKE us on Facebook

Spread the word

Loading…

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here.

© 2013   A community of people touched by diabetes, run by the Diabetes Hands Foundation.

Badges  |  Contact Us  |  Terms of Service