Things Are Changing!

The migration of TuDiabetes has begun

Content created between now and the launch of our new site on April 20th will NOT be moved to that new home, but our community values and Terms of Service still apply during this time.We are not accepting new members during this transition period. If you want to join the TuDiabetes community please send an e-mail to TuDiabetesAdmin@gmail.com. We will send you an invitation to join after the migration is completed.

Read about the migration and see images of the new site!

I just read this article and was VERY excited about the prospect!!

"A special tattoo ink that changes color based on glucose levels inside the skin is under development by Massachusetts-based Draper Laboratories. The injectable nanotech ink could eventually free diabetics from painful blood glucose tests."

Even if (like CGM) it's not directly monitoring blood glucose levels, it sure seems like a safer, less invasive (and cheaper) option to CGM:
http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2009/02/12/diabetes-tattoo.html

Views: 237

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I bet they could find a lot of guinea pigs right here! I'm in :)
This is super weird!

But I dunno...I'm pretty skeptical about its actual benefits to helping tight control. It seems like a color wouldn't really be able to tell you a precise number. Could it differentiate a high of 160 from a high of 260?

I'd still prefer a traditional CGM with trend graphs myself!

But the idea behind this sure is interesting. I guess you never know where it could lead us in the future!!
I would probably try it, but I think Jaclyn is right that it will be inaccurate or imprecise.
The press release talks about relief from "painful blood glucose tests." This has been a selling point for a lot of new diabetes technologies (like the failed Gluco-watch) so I suppose they have done their focus group research to find out what people don't like about diabetes. Maybe these people can go back to peeing on chemstrips. As for me, finger sticks are not really painful. Especially compared to the painful diabetic complications that could result from poor bg control.
Yea, I don't know about tight control either, but is sure would be handy for folks, like myself, who are hypoglycemic unaware to be able to glance at something and at least have a general idea of what's up. I could see putting it on the inside of my wrist where it could be seen easily, not only by myself but by EMTs. Of course, I suppose we'd then have to come up with a standard tat so they would know what the heck it was...
I like this! Shall we add it to newborns like we do silver nitrate for their eyes?
On the OTHER hand, "What carcinogens are in nanotech ink?" My 5th cousin three times removed died of Ca of the liver from being around printer's ink all her life in the 18 & 1900s!
I'm in,,,I like new trendy fashion!
To my cousins from Massachusetts, who gloat about how "A lot of great things have come out of Boston," my standard response is, "Yeah, like United Airlines Flight 175."

There's my tasteless cheap shot against the state of Massachusetts for today, thank you.
I think it would be GREAT to look down and see actually when you need to pull out your glucometer due to a change in a small tatoo's color.., and as others have posted, less invasive and expensive than a CGM.. I wouldn't mind it at all!!! Sign me up!!!

God Bless,
Brunetta
Type1 41 Years
Insulin Pumper 5 1/2 years
Manny,

I sort of got one of those. I married her 31 years ago. She goes red with fear every time I go low.

Rick
Yes, in a "Good" world this could be an asset for Diabetics. But with our imperfect world, I am reminded of the tattooed numbers on the Holocaust victims/survivors. I don't want to be a Diabetic Victim. I may die of something else but it won't be from Diabetes. So I don't need a tatt.
I was reading about this the other day, how exciting! I'd contemplate getting it in the shape of the dark mark haha
Manny-

Clever ideal but I'm gonna stick to finger pricking...insurance has issue's paying for CGM's, Omnipod and stuff we really need. I can't see them paying for a Tattoo.

Cherise

RSS

Advertisement



REsources

From the Diabetes Hands Foundation blog...

DHF Joins Diabetes Advocacy Alliance

Diabetes Hands Foundation is incredibly honored to join the Diabetes Advocacy Alliance, an organization with the drive and potential to affect a powerful, positive impact on diabetes and healthcare policy. Diabetes Advocacy Alliance is a 20-member coalition of leading professional Read on! →

Helmsley Charitable Trust Renews Support for DHF

HELMSLEY CHARITABLE TRUST GRANTS SUPPORT TO DIABETES HANDS FOUNDATION FOR FOURTH YEAR  Funding in 2015 to support major transitions in programs and leadership at Diabetes Hands Foundation BERKELEY, CA: February 18, 2015 – The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Read on! →

Diabetes Hands Foundation Team

DHF TEAM

Melissa Lee
(Interim Executive Director, Editor, has type 1)


Manny Hernandez
(Co-Founder, has LADA)

Emily Coles (Head of Communities, has type 1)

Mila Ferrer
(EsTuDiabetes Community Manager, mother of a child with type 1)

Mike Lawson
(Head of Experience, has type 1)

Corinna Cornejo
(Director of Operations and Development, has type 2)

Desiree Johnson  (Administrative and Programs Assistant, has type 1)

DHF VOLUNTEERS


Lead Administrator

Brian (bsc) (has type 2)


Administrators

Lorraine (mother of type 1)
Marie B (has type 1)

DanP (has Type 1)

Gary (has type 2)

David (has type 2)

 

LIKE us on Facebook

Spread the word

Loading…

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here.

© 2015   A community of people touched by diabetes, run by the Diabetes Hands Foundation.

Badges  |  Contact Us  |  Terms of Service