I am a current MM 722 user with a now dead Dexcom unit and I am considering replacing it with the MM CGM. I love the Dexcom unit and would gladly get it again but I am being lured by the thought of having one less device. My husband has taken to calling me Inspector Gadget and cyborg because of all my electronic devices (cell, CGM, pump, nook, ipod and glucometer).

If there is anyone out there who has had both and can give me feedback on their experiences, I would greatly appreciate it.

Tags: CGM, Dexcom, MM

Views: 210

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I'll be keeping up with this thread because I'm a MM user w/ an almost dead transmitter that is considering a Dex. :)
How do you like your MM CGM?
I don't have near the problems w/ MM as most people do. I like it. However, when I updated to the new MM Revel pump, the alarms aren't as loud. This causes issues w/ me not hearing the alarms at night (I'm a heavy sleeper) and that worries me since I live alone. My accuracy w/ the MM is pretty good from what I can tell, only being way off if I'm super high or super low. The needles are long and horrible, but I just don't look when inserting. :)
I like my MiniMed pump/CGM. I can't imagine lugging around another gizmo. Occasionally the telemetry gets goofy on me but sometimes when I think it's the CGM being off, I'll adjust the pump rates and things fall back into place nicely. I never tried the Dexcom but # of gizmos is critical.
A little more than two years ago, I tried the MM Guardian (I wear an Animas pump). It was so wildly inaccurate and difficult to calibrate that I quit using it after several months of trying. Fast forward to several months ago, when I got my Dexcom. Wow! It is really accurate, easy to use, and easy to calibrate. I am still stunned by its accuracy. So I would say stick with Dexcom, it is way better technology. I find it very interesting (and think it speaks volumes) that Gary Scheiner, author of Think Like a Pancreas, uses the MM pump but uses the Dexcom CGM.
My CDE advised me to wait until after the first of the year when, we hope, the new, smaller & more accurate MM cgm will be coming out. Of course, I don't know how soon in '12 it will come out. depends on FDA. I have waited this long though and decided to wait a few more months. For your case, you would automatically get the new sensors when they are approved. So, you could go on and deal with a few months of a less than satisfactory MM cgm, per some people, and hope the new cgm sensors will get out early in the year.
My worry is that w/ the whole "pump hacking" that the FDA will further postpone any new technology.
I used MM CGMS for over 3 years, and now use Dexcom. I don't mind having 2 devices, but that is a critical deciding point for many. I still use MM pump (522), not the Revel, so I did not have the 'predictive' alarms, and wish the Dex had them.

The Dexcom has been more accurate for me, and more responsive to trends. I also find I check the Dex more often, compared to MM that I had to dig out my pocket or SPI belt just to see what the trend or number was. I usually have my Dex on the desk/table when possible. As a result, I made corrections quicker, and improved my A1C.

So if you primarily rely on the alarms, and really prefer one device, the MM might be better for you..
For now, I'm sticking with Dexcom.

You can contact MM and see if you can get a trial.
You guys are so great! I appreciate all of your feedback. I think I am going to stick with my Dexcom for now. I really do like its performance and I don't want to be disappointed by the MM CGM so for now I will stick with two devices. hey what else are purses for, right?
I too began with the MM 722 and CGM, but am one who became so discouraged and annoyed at the inaccurate readings from the MM CGM that I would turn off all alarms during the night because it was so consistantly wrong. I stopped using the CGM. When I was eligable to purchase again, I switched to Dex and from day one, have been very satisfied. There are still problems with the Dex (I believe that is just normal with this type of device), the problems are much less and more easily correctable than with the MM CGM. If possible, try for a trial of the MM device first before buying.

RSS

Advertisement



REsources

From the Diabetes Hands Foundation blog...

Together, We Can Get Diabetes Co-Stars to 10,000 Views!

Above is a photo of Diabetes Hands Foundation’s own Manny Hernandez with the stars of the Diabetes Co-Stars Video, “Strength in Numbers.” In case you haven’t heard the news yet, there is a new video making it’s way through the …
Continue Reading

Congratulations Diabetes Advocates Scholarship Recipients!

The Diabetes Hands Foundation and Diabetes Advocates Program is proud to announce and congratulate the members of DA who were granted scholarships to attend diabetes conferences in 2013! Thanks to a generous grant from Novo Nordisk, in 2013 we were …
Continue Reading

TuDiabetes Team

DHF STAFF

Manny Hernandez
(Co-Founder, Editor, has LADA)

Emily Coles
(Head of Communities, has type 1)

Emily Walton
(Business Manager)

Mike Lawson
(Head of Experience, has type 1)

Corinna Cornejo
(Development Manager, has type 2)

Heather Gabel
(Administrative and Programs Assistant, has type 1)

DHF VOLUNTEERS


Lead Administrator
Bradford (has type 1)

Administrators
Lorraine (mother of type 1)
Marie B (has type 1)

Teena (has type 2)

Brian (bsc) (has type 2)

jrtpup (has type 1)

 

LIKE us on Facebook

Spread the word

Loading…

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here.

© 2013   A community of people touched by diabetes, run by the Diabetes Hands Foundation.

Badges  |  Contact Us  |  Terms of Service