hi. anyone get diagnosed with type 1 later in life? i got it at 32 yrs old. it hit me fast.within a few months i lost about 20lbs...lost most of my eye sight...couldnt remember anything. so exhausted....thirst beyond belief.....it was a huge adjustment b/c i lived 32 yrs without it. i felt like i litterally started my life over. it was so overwhelming. id love to hear from ppl tht got it even in their early 20s. ive only had it 5 yrs so it took me til now to finally get things under somewhat of control. i am very outgoing n always felt very insync with others...now having diabetes i find a part of me feels very "alone" even though im not. even when i explain what im going threw at times..i know tht ppl dont really get what im goin threw. wld love to hear from ppl in the same boat as me. :))

Views: 2581

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Thanks for clarifying Terry, and I apologize for leaping so swiftly on my soap box! If all the adult-onset Type 1s are included in the stats for T1, and since the vast majority of new-onset Type 1 is over the age of 20, it is probably not true that the "most likely age of diagnosis is 10-14." I have read that there is a peak at age 10-14 and also a peak at ~40. Anyhow, again, thanks for clarifying and we are certainly on the same page, and I appreciate your comments.

Melitta - Thanks for the reply. I think we're dealing with a matter of semantics here. The incidence or rate of T1 diabetes diagnosis (number per 100,000 per year per limited age cohort) is probably the highest in the 10-14 age group. Comparing absolute numbers, I agree that the number of adult T1 diagnoses outnumber child diagnoses. In that context, I still think that ages 10-14 is the most likely age of diagnosis based on the rate of diagnosis for any given year. We may be splitting hairs here but I think we've illuminated some important points. I appreciate your response.

Just to further pick nits: I think the stats that are out there are skewed because "new diagnosis" numbers would include people like me who were initially misdiagnosed type 2 due solely to age. I'm sure nobody went back in and corrected my initial diagnosis for the purpose of "initial diagnosis stats". Since about 10-15% of newly diagnosed type 2's are actually type ones that would be a large portion of adult diagnosed type ones who don't correctly appear in the type 1 stats.

I just looked at a website for a Type 1 support organization in which the old outdated stat is still being repeated."Type 1's are about 10% of the population of diabetics". Nope. Including the misdiagnosed type 2's that figure rises to nearly 25%. I wonder how many years it will take for the stats to catch up with the reality?

So does my ~43 for knowing that something was wrong, and my formal diagnosis when VERY symptomatic at 45 qualify for that second peak? :-)

Of course :) !!!!

ty very much terry

A few months ago I was diagnosed with Type 1 at age 35. My dad had Type 1 and I worried about getting it when I was younger but after age 30, I assumed I was in the clear. Nope! I agree- most people have no idea what diabetes is like and many assume it's not that serious. I was in my last semester of grad school when diagnosed, and most of my professors didn't give me much of a break! My biggest pet peeve is when I tell someone I have diabetes and they say, "well, it's easy to manage." WTF? Diabetes care is like learning a new subject that changes every day- and my life basically depends on consistently giving it the attention necessary to stabilize my BGs. Still, I'm also really grateful that I didn't develop it earlier.

I cannot agree w u more!  its so fustrating but when I read ur post n others I feel so validated n understood. The most compassionate of ppl stil cnt relate to our evday b******* tht we deal with with diabetes. Its such an isolating feeling at times. but hearing similar stories HELPS SO MUCH  ty very much for ur kind words n understanding n if u ever have to vent feel free! I'm all ears! ;)

God it's hard to read your posts, Jessica! I'm sure you have lots of good things to say and it would be easier to understand them with out all the text message abbreviations!

i have carpel tunnel so bad so the less i type the better

Sorry to hear it. I had it very bad as well and had surgery on both hands in 1994. No problem ever since!

REALLY? THATS GREAT! SO U THINK IT WORKS? I GOT MIXED REVIEWS ABOUT THE SURGERY. HOW LONG WAS THE RECOVERY TIME?

RSS

Advertisement



REsources

From the Diabetes Hands Foundation blog...

How do you measure the work of volunteers?

329,040 minutes, 329,040 moments so dear. 329,040 minutes — How do you measure, measure volunteers? In smileys, in tears shed, in counsel, in cups of coffee. In units, in carb counts, in laughter, in strife. In 329,040 minutes – how …
Continue Reading

DHF Expands Board of Advisors

Diabetes Hands Foundation has always relied on partners and advisors to increase its understanding of the diabetes space, in order to better serve people touched by diabetes. Today this is as true as ever, as we proudly announce the expansion …
Continue Reading

TuDiabetes Team

DHF STAFF

Manny Hernandez
(Co-Founder, Editor, has LADA)

Emily Coles
(Head of Communities, has type 1)

Emily Walton
(Business Manager)

Mike Lawson
(Head of Experience, has type 1)

Corinna Cornejo
(Development Manager, has type 2)

Heather Gabel
(Administrative and Programs Assistant, has type 1)

DHF VOLUNTEERS


Lead Administrator
Bradford (has type 1)

Administrators
Lorraine (mother of type 1)
Marie B (has type 1)

Teena (has type 2)

Brian (bsc) (has type 2)

jrtpup (has LADA)

 

LIKE us on Facebook

Spread the word

Loading…

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here.

© 2013   A community of people touched by diabetes, run by the Diabetes Hands Foundation.

Badges  |  Contact Us  |  Terms of Service