Things Are Changing!
The migration of TuDiabetes has begun
Content created between now and the launch of our new site on April 20th will NOT be moved to that new home, but our community values and Terms of Service still apply during this time.We are not accepting new members during this transition period. If you want to join the TuDiabetes community please send an e-mail to TuDiabetesAdmin@gmail.com. We will send you an invitation to join after the migration is completed.
Has there been anyone else who feels the name 'type 1 diabetes' is lacking in name? I did a quick search and found this article from last year:
Wanted: A new name for type 1 diabetes:
I feel the need for a change. I guess I'm just annoyed that people assume all sorts of things when they discover that I'm diabetic. Because of all of the connotations of type 2 attached to the word 'diabetes', I feel like many are unable to appreciate that there is a less common form of diabetes, with with distinct needs and patterns separate from the most prevalent form. To support this distinction, I almost feel that there is a need to get a distinct name for this condition, and that this will be the only way that most can realize the distinction between the two types of diabetes.
As for the name itself, I'm somewhat at a loss, but "Beta depletion" keeps coming to mind. It's just lacking some 'zing', you know? It would be difficult to make into an adjective (compared to 'diabetes' as a noun, and 'diabetic' the adjective).
I agree that there may be benefit in a name change, but I just do not think it is feasable. I guess you are more optimistic that I am. I just consider these another issue of being diabetic. People mistakenly thinking your the wrong type, constant management, blood stains on clothes, etc.
For my own amusement and to not have to explain diabetes to everyone I have been telling some that I am "Carbohydrate Challenged". I explain my condition very truthfully. I do not digest carbohydrates well, therefore I have to limit and monitor every carb I eat and if I am not careful I will end up feeling pretty bad. Most people take this definition and do not ask more as it is sufficient for them. Some ask more and these are the people that care and may "get it". I am happy to answer all of their questions.
I came across this a couple of years ago and found it pretty funny.
Hahahaha oh my goodness. THAT'S funny. Although something inside of me is diabolically opposed to that idea, it is still enjoyable to read, an interesting thought activity.
I guess I just don't think I could bring myself to say "Oh, I have CRAP" if someone were to inquire about my medical status, although I do believe it would pretty much cover how I felt about the condition.
But, yeah. No. Not gonna happen.
But Valerie, it's probably better than saying "Oh I have CRABs" as one of the comments said, Chronic Ruthless Attack of Beta Cells. I'm sure that would leave them completely befuddled as if being a T1D in a T2 world isn't already confusing enough for most folks.
As a Type 2 Diabetic, I totally agree with you. Currently, a diagnosis of T2 means that you don't really have diabetes but something like bad lifestyle syndrome. While the medical and insurance communities are aware of the difference, the general public including many employers are not. As this lifestyle issue is generally associated with age, it stands to reason that the discrimination towards t2s would be directed t1s as they age. This is just wrong!!!! If a name change would change the focus back to a cure for T1 then it should happen!!! I truly believe the cure is close.
That being said, I'm thankful that we are all able to come together here. I have recieved so much support and information from my T1 friends on TuD.
Well, the way they diagnose things, it is probably reasonable to name T1 for the mechanism somehow. It is an autoimmune reaction. I would vote for Autobetes and those having it could be Autobetic. And then since T2 is a diagnosis of exclusion, we could name it Otherbetes and then I would be otherbetic.
And then I would like to rename non-diabetic people. I'd like to do what the autistic community has done, they call "normal" people neurotypical. We could call nond-diabetics "glucotypical."
Oh my goodness. I LOVE this post.
I like the idea of Capin101's "carb challenged" description and the "glucotypical" nomenclature that bsc suggested. Perhaps I will just start telling people I'm not glucotypical, then explain as Capin does.
In my teens, I was often bitter that the response I typically got when explaining that I was diabetic was either "you're too young for that" or "you're too skinny for that!" I'm over it now, and agree with Capin that a name change just may not be feasible. But who knows.. Maybe it will happen one day and we can throw a GlucoAbNormal party to celebrate!
When I was a kid it was "juvenile diabetes". Well, I'm middle aged now, and no longer a kid, but I still have it!
T1 means some surprising things to some people. I've been challenged "you can't say you're a T1 unless you show me your C-peptide and GAD results, without those you could be a T2". Wow, let's see how much we can raise the entry bar for a disease that none of us wants!
I think that IDDM (Insulin Dependent) captures a lot without delving into details about C-peptide-this and GAD-that. Adult T1's and T2's that use insulin, may have some different history, but they both depend on insulin and may have similar risk factors for a wide range of complications.
I was diagnosed as a "juvenile Diabetic" too I have too since grown up The name change from JD to TYpe 1 was a learning curve for me. I will get used to another if there is one though
I couldn't care less. What the general public perceives has no effect on how I have to manage my condition. Really, it doesn't matter how much information the general public receives because there will always be people who think they know more about your own condition than you anyway. The only thing that matters is whether or not they feel motivated enough to demonstrate ther own personal level of ignorance. Changing the name of our condition won't change that.
At this point in my life, I feel that the best way to not be bothered by what people think is to not be bothered by what people think. If they are curious, I answer questions to the best of my ability and to the limits of my patience.
I totally appreciate your thoughts. But to challenge it, what if there was more funding to a disease because it got more awareness? And then, would that not directly impact you if you live with it every day? Just a thought! I know it's also important to limit the influence other people's thoughts have on your self!