TuDiabetes - A Community for People Touched by Diabetes

I just read an article on diaTribe about a new CGMS from Abbott ( Abbott FreeStyle Navigator ) and an updated Dexcom 7 that can be manually calibrated. I currently use the FreeStyle Flash glucometer but was thinking of switching to One Touch because the Dexcom works with those glucometers. The Abbott FreeStyle Navigator has a built in glucometer for calibration and works with the Freestyle test strips that I currently use. However, the Abbott FreeStyle Navigator sensor are only good for 5 days versus 7 for the Dexcom.

So now I have choices.
  • Get the Abbott FreeStyle Navigator and stick with my current meter and supplies and live with a 5 day sensor
  • Get the Dexcom 7, a One Touch Ultra 2 and supplies

CGMS ( the Dexcom at least ) and other supplies are covered by my insurance plan and my endo is willing to loan me a Dexcom unit. What to do?

Tags: abbott, dexcom, freestyle

Share

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

For what it's worth I would use what your insurance is willing to pay for. I use the Gurdian, my insurance does not pay for any of it. No matter which one you use if the insurance does not pay for it, it will get very expensive very quick.

Reply to This

Aubrey,
Insurance covers the Dexcom, OneTouch and Fressstyle flash. I do not know about the FreeStyle Navigator. I'll check on that. I want to reduce the amount of stuff I carry around with me. If the CGMS already has a glucometer then I will have one less thing to carry around.

Reply to This

I have the Minimed minilink, however, I switched pumps from Medtronic to the Omnipod. I have heard that Dexcom and Omnipod are working on a single pod solution so that both the sensor and infusion site will be contained in a single pod with a single meter, pdm and receiver.

However, I would like to see a side-by-side comparison of both the Dexcom and Navigator. I do realize that the sensor for the Navigator is 5 days but when the Medtronic sensor came out it was only for 3 days until we figured out a way around it and made it last for 6 days. I think 7 days might be a bit long to have something inserted under your skin. The 6 days for Medtronic was itching like crazy on the 6th day.

Anyone see a comparison of these two?

Reply to This

I just got a Dexcom 7 loaner from endo offices this morning. The nurse spent 30 minutes explaining how it works. She put a sensor on me and showed me how to calibrate it. The things drove me nuts for a few hours. My BG dropped under 70 and stayed that way for a couple of hours before finally climbing to 100.

Reply to This

Khurt

I've had very good luck with the Dexcom. I've learned to change the sensor in the evening and then restart it the next morning. That way the readings have settled down, otherwise the first several hours after a new sensor has started can be tricky.

One this is to wait until your blood sugar is stable before calibrating. This gives much better results. This is another reason to wait until morning, since most of us have a stable morning level (even if it is high!).

I did put a video on YouTube showing the difference between the old and the new Dexcom. Later I ran the numbers for the 13 days I had the new one on (one sensor), the old one said my average BG was 117, the old one said 134! Being able to calibrate with a more accurate meter makes a big difference.

Reply to This

I have the Medtronic Minimed CGM and have been wearing it for about 4 months total. I've taken breaks from it because of the frustration of getting huge discrepancies in the readings between the finger stick and the CGS. I would love to make it work but after hours of talking with people on the 800 line and having two people train me in person I still feel that it isn't nearly accurate enough for me to make it useful. Any suggestions?

Reply to This

Your story is similar to my experience, except I tried wearing it for over a year. The transmitter finally just gave out. I am negotiating on a Navigator right now. I believe the MiniMed setup needs more work to get it to work good.

Reply to This

Love my navigator after trying the Dexcom....works great.

Reply to This

I have used the Dex since 9/08. I did have a few issues with it at first but after the learning curve I won't do without it. As far as the sensors when the system times out after 7 days I just restart it and have had a sensor last up to 14 days with absolutely no adverse concerns of any sort. No irritations, or sores. The inserted sensor seems to be very body friendly. This just may be me I don't know. The new Dex 7 plus looks even better. I have talked to our rep and even though she's not diabetic she has worn one for 10 days and has had no problems and very accurate blood readings and in 10 days has had not interruptions in the readings. The system seems to be vastly improved. My last A1C 12/08 was 6.6 the lowest since 1988. I attribute that to the Dex. Check it out on line.

Reply to This

As you see in other posts, I'm raving about the improvements. Far, far less instances of "???", and when it does happen, one bG entry *always* restarts the graph. Now on day 12, and the readings are rock solid, even on highs and lows-- whereas the original "SEVEN" would have been within a day or two of dying by now, failing to show my full deviation from near-normal bGs.

One thing though-- be sure to THROW AWAY the One-Touch cable. Hand entry is better, it seems as if Dexcom still gets confused by even small time discrepancies between "meter time" and Dexcom time. When you just set the reading via Dexcom's buttons, it's always taken as brand-new and valid.

Reply to This

Khurt, sorry to see that Dexcom had "crazy" numbers for you. But that is not unusual! Most people do not wear the Dexcom Sensors on the frontal abdomen, where Dexcom says. Lots of people use "upper butt cheek", high enough to avoid sitting on it but still in a "meaty" part. A few have great success with "love handles", straight down from armpits and one inch above belts.

I use both of those sites :))) Never had any luck at all with frontal abdomen, I was going to send it back until someone told me to try a "love handle" site.

I feel that 5 days versus 7 days is not important. But there is a HUGE difference-- when the Dexcom needs to be restarted (on every 7th day, I usually get 15-20 days from each one) you only have to wait 2 hours before it starts giving readings again. With Abbott, you must wait TEN HOURS. For me that would be many alarms to wake up and bG test (at night), or many, many interruptions to bG test during the day.

But, some people have switched from Dexcom to Navigator and found it to be astoundingly more accurate. THAT would bea reason to choose Abbott, in spite of the 10-hour warm up time.

You know that in just another month or two, Dexcom will allow you to use buttons to enter the finger-stick glucometer readings, so you could continue to use Freestyle with Dexcom too. (One-Touch uses lots more blood, but even more important for me, you need to have that cable to connect the meter to the Dexcom. Not convenient.)

If my insurance will pay for Abbott strips, then I will switch to Freestyle myself. But the first day on Dexcom is often crazy-bad, and maybe you need to use a different Sensor location (as I do).

When you get good results, as I do, then perhaps you will choose to ignore the rule "test with finger-poke before treating". Although I have an "extra" one-touch in the car, I almost never carry a one touch meter (or strips, or lancet device) anywhere. Only on day #1 of a new Sensor, out of 15-20 days wearing time.

So there is almost always only Dexcom in my pocket when I visit customers, or go shopping, or Opera concert, or anything. You might find that Abbott is the same-- even though it contains a meter, there might be no need to carry strips and lancet device at all, and you might hardly ever again actually use your meter.

Reply to This

So the rule is "test before treating"? This thing indicates lows at least three times a day. Plus twice daily calibrations. So this thing will allow me to prick my fingers as much as I do now with my glucometer?

Reply to This

RSS

© 2009   Created by Diabetes Hands Foundation, P.O. Box 9421, Berkeley, CA 94709.
Diabetes Hands Foundation (DHF) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit. Donations to DHF are eligible to be deducted.

Disclaimer
The contents of TuDiabetes is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition, including without limitation diabetes. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read on TuDiabetes.

If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your doctor or 911 immediately. The Diabetes Hands Foundation does not endorse any specific tests, physicians, products, services, procedures, opinions, or other information that are advertised or mentioned on the web site.


TuDiabetes®, TuDiabetes.org®, Word in Your Hand™, Drawing Diabetes™, Diabetes Supplies Art™ and No-Sugar Added Poetry™ are trademarks or registered trademarks of the Diabetes Hands Foundation.

Badges  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service