Hi, I just started the CGMS last week and things have gone well overall. I had an instance last night where it said "WEAK SIGNAL", but moving my pump closer helped. My problem has been with my meter BG's radically differing from the CGMS readings. My trainer told me to expect discrepancies of up to 20 points, but I've had several that differed by as much as 50 points! I just did a meter BG and it was 241, but my CGMS showed 194...I haven't eaten in 3 hours. I'm trying to not overcorrect my BG's for a few days on my trainer's advice. I realize I need to still rely on meter BG's for my actual numbers, but are large discrepancies like this normal?

Views: 192

Replies to This Discussion

Hi Angi !

Difference comes from point where your measure BG. If you measure from finger you get real value, but since CGMS reads from different place, you get different value... Theoretically after 15-30 minutes, value on CGMS should be the same as measurement from finger. As for difference between finger and CGMS in points... This difference will never be the same.. For example if you BG is falling very rapidly, difference can be bigger... And since CGMS is experimental device, this things can happen.

Andy
Yesterday, it was amazing! The CGM and my bloodsugars were exact, that only happens once in a while for me. Usually they are pretty close BUT some days I wonder why I am wearing it because they are so far off. I guess it really depends on when you calibrate. But Andy was right saying that these things can happen because it isn't 100% yet.......
Hi Angie. For me (Dexcom), the first day is MUCH less reliable than than the following weeks. It seems as if the "warm up period" really needs much longer than two hours to stabilize.

I never got good results from MM when I tried it (about two years ago). But you might be having the same effect which I have on Dexcom. Usually, when I'm having really bad results after the warm-up, it's a lot better to just restart the thing than it is to enter additional calibrations. new calibrations make adjustments to the "flakey" numbers, the flakey results are still being used. A full restart (with a fresh two-hour warmup) clears things up instantly.

And, have you tried some alternate sites? my frontal abs never worked as well as my love handles or butt cheeks. I know that for appearance and clothing issues butt cheeks might not be viable, but love handles (near the belt line, straight below the ribs) might work better for you too. If you sleep on your side, though, you'll need to make sure that your Sensor is on the "up side", and not being squashed against the bed.

Slightly OT: After you get used to CGMS, and get somewhat more reliable results, you can correct FAR more aggressively than you used to. This is because you can look at the graph 2 hours later and see the trend (slope of the curve)-- if it's falling too fast, you just pile on some quick carbs to prevent the hypo from ever happening. Sometimes I add carbs at bG levels as high as 130-140, because I see that I'm gonna fall through the floor in the next half hour without them. Dexcom has been found to be faster at showing lows during drop off periods by several people who have used both, but it is fast enough-- you'll just need to learn watching the trend, rather than just the bG value (as you've always done with finger sticks.)
I've found that my Minimed sensors are not the best at tracking high BGs and that's when I see the biggest difference. During the night it's even worse (for catching highs) and I've woken up close to 300 while the sensor said 180, but the same sensor would track fine during the day.

I believe other people have mentioned that their sensors just don't catch highs very wekll. I have my High alert set to 160 because if I set it any higher, I'm afraid my BG will be out of control by the time the alarm sounds.

Also, I think the trainer was supposed to tell you to expect differences up to 20 percent, not 20 points. Everything I've read and have been told said 20%. So, unfortunately, the 194 vs. your meter BG of 241 falls into that +/- 20% range (barely). I find that most of mine, other than when I go high during the night, are much closer.

Oh, I also think the sensors don't catch lows too well at night either! I have my low alarm set to 75.
Liz, you might be pushing the Sensors for too long: When they're dying from insuficient reagents left, MM Sensors do pretty well on normal bG but refuse to cross a line, say 150 mg/dL, to match a high. No matter how much higher your bG really goes, it barely budges above that erronious "maximum".

Lots of us think MM is slower than Abbott, or even Dex, at alarming the lows it DOES catch, and more likely to miss lows without alarming at all. My Dex seems almost right on bG without delay when I'm going down, but it's late/delayed when I'm going up. MM seems to have about the same delay in both directions, I've no idea why.

If you end up sleeping on the Sensors, maybe try an alternate site? "Stale" ISF leads to totally whacked numbers, and I think that compression on the site tends to prevent the ISF from getting "refreshed" via blood flow.
Even a brand new sensor with a good Isig will lag at night if my BG rises. I believe Minimed has told people that inactivity can lead to the sensor flatlining, or not tracking well. I pretty much like to sleep at night, so yeah, I'm pretty inactive then!

I know a sensor is dead when the Isig drops to a low single digit and stays there even when I push my BG a little higher. I change it then. I'm amazed when I heard that some people can get 3-4 weeks from a single sensor.

The sensor I had in up until yesterday was working great. Right after eating dinner and for the next two hours, it kept telling me I was low and the Isig was in the 4 range, so I knew it was dead and removed it. That one was on day 9.

I usually insert the sensors on my lower abdomen but in September I tried my arms for the first time. My left arm was so-so but every sensor I've inserted in my right arm was a winner right from the start. I wish I had a few extra right arms to use! I try not to use it for 2 weeks after removing a sensor. I've tried my upper abdomen but it wasn't tracking well, and my one leg site so far didn't work out.
my alarms are set higher and lower for the same reason......to catch them early. My low alarm is set at 90 (I have no low symptoms) and my high alarm at 200 (it used to be 180)
My experiences have been very similar to this. Almost every time my CGMS says 70-75, I'm really in the 50s. Maybe it's just not quick enough. A lot of the time it'll be spot on again after I come out of my low!
I had an experience yesterday (thursday)....just after my wonderful day, I changed my sensor and the new one gave me problems from the beginning. I think I hit a blood vessel or something. After 5 Cal Errors during the day I finally decided to remove the sensor after it told me I was 70, 200, 350....all within 10 minutes! When I removed it, it was a gusher..... the blood had definitely traveled up the little tubey thingy and thats why all the readings were so off. Today seems to be a better day......keep your fingers crossed.
yep, that sort of thing happens from time to time. I've asked for two "freebies" from Dexcom during my two years of usage, and they're happy to comply, even though the CS woman asked me to please plug it in the computer and send in the data over the Internet once.
Hi,

I also have a alot of discrepancies with my sensor but my doctor mentioned if your sugar is really high or really low the sensor could be way off when your sugar is in a good range the sensor is more accurate, So basically when you need it the most when you are high or low it does not work as well hmmmmmm. I also heard not to put adhesive patch over the whole sensor to cut in in half it keeps in flatter I have not tried it yet but my friend does it that way she uses her sensors on her leg I tried that but whenever I would change or have to use the bathroom I would hit it or pull it out no matter how carefull I was.
I tend to use my stomach for the pump and sensor it is sensitive there though and that stinkin needle to put the sensor in is way tooooooo fricken big excuse my language it hurts like hell and it think and way to long I hope they change that soon. I have had a bad batch of sensors too I am not a fan of mini meds customer service. I have to say when I had a animas pump they were always very nice and helpfull I am looking forward to them working with dexcor for the sensor next year I think I will switch to them.
Sometimes it takes 48 hours for me to get good on track readings. Sometimes i get good readings from the start. When i get a sensor that is consistantly off...i do my best to try to get it in line...sometimes it just does not work. It could be placement - i have found that certain sensor locations work better than others - but that was thru trial and error.

good luck...once you get the kinks worked out, you will love it.

RSS

Advertisement



REsources

From the Diabetes Hands Foundation blog...

How do you measure the work of volunteers?

329,040 minutes, 329,040 moments so dear. 329,040 minutes — How do you measure, measure volunteers? In smileys, in tears shed, in counsel, in cups of coffee. In units, in carb counts, in laughter, in strife. In 329,040 minutes – how …
Continue Reading

DHF Expands Board of Advisors

Diabetes Hands Foundation has always relied on partners and advisors to increase its understanding of the diabetes space, in order to better serve people touched by diabetes. Today this is as true as ever, as we proudly announce the expansion …
Continue Reading

TuDiabetes Team

DHF STAFF

Manny Hernandez
(Co-Founder, Editor, has LADA)

Emily Coles
(Head of Communities, has type 1)

Emily Walton
(Business Manager)

Mike Lawson
(Head of Experience, has type 1)

Corinna Cornejo
(Development Manager, has type 2)

Heather Gabel
(Administrative and Programs Assistant, has type 1)

DHF VOLUNTEERS


Lead Administrator
Bradford (has type 1)

Administrators
Lorraine (mother of type 1)
Marie B (has type 1)

Teena (has type 2)

Brian (bsc) (has type 2)

jrtpup (has LADA)

 

LIKE us on Facebook

Spread the word

Loading…

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here.

© 2013   A community of people touched by diabetes, run by the Diabetes Hands Foundation.

Badges  |  Contact Us  |  Terms of Service