Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution Group


Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution Group

This is a group for anyone that is using Dr. Bernstein's Diabetes Solution in full or in part (using a very low carb diet of around 30g/day) to manage their diabetes.

Members: 462
Latest Activity: Aug 19

Diabetes Forum

You need fat to absorb vitamins

Started by BadMoonT2. Last reply by BadMoonT2 Aug 15. 6 Replies

Here's an interesting blog post by Registered Dietician Lily Nichols.Quoting the post titled 5…Continue

Dr. Bernstein Treatment

Started by carlyo7. Last reply by type1VT Aug 14. 36 Replies

Hey everyone! I was so shocked and excited to find this group involving Dr. Bernstein! I was a former patient of his and went into his treatment plan 2 months after my diagnosis. I was treated very…Continue

Staying on track/motivation

Started by Havarti. Last reply by v/prediabetic Aug 9. 15 Replies

For those of you who've managed to stick with this diet long term...how do you do it? What is some tangible advice/tips to stay on track? What do you eat in a day (sample breakfast, lunch and…Continue

Low Carb Breakfast

Started by Havarti. Last reply by BadMoonT2 Aug 2. 7 Replies

Hi everyone,So I've been reading about Dr. Bernstein's methods for treating D, and am finally jumping on the bandwagon. I've been eating 2 slices of Country Naturals brand bacon every day for…Continue

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution Group to add comments!

Comment by onesaint on April 12, 2012 at 1:37pm

Although, I don't think it's a joke, I still had a ROFL at

I have $100,000 invested in a company that manufactures dialysis machines

as an argument for poor control. Thanks!
Comment by Hana Rous on April 12, 2012 at 1:32pm

I realise that keeping BG to 85 [4.7mmol/l] isn't easy, but the point I try to make is that it should be the TARGET.
Accepting that something is difficult and may not be achieved, is no excuse for changing the target.

Comment by Natalie ._c- on April 11, 2012 at 1:29pm

Muleman, I can only speak for the US, but medical scientific caution, and reluctance to treat people who may not actually need it, because of the impact on their lives. Concern for the bottom line is a HUGE issue here, and it better not come from doctors' or industry pockets. Lack of DOCUMENTED evidence for the efficacy of low-carb way of life. (Bernstein's greatest mistake), and belief that people cannot follow it anyway. Political support for one way over another because of intense lobbying. Govt. meddling in medical affairs (intended to be protective and pro-active, but not always so). Old-timers protecting their turf. Did I give you the impression that it's really complex????

Comment by Trudy on April 11, 2012 at 11:41am

It would truly be nice if we could maintain 85 all the time, but it's not always that easy. Thyroid problems, inactivity, all sort of thing get in the way. And then there are those nasty hypos. I think each of us needs to do the best we can given the circumstances at any given time. I do admire both of you, my friends Hanna and muleman!

Comment by muleman on April 11, 2012 at 11:28am

Great Info, Hana. But, oh how can the medical professions be so chaotic in their views?
I was thinking I would get better treatment for my T2 in England. Obviously not!
Everyone in the medical profession here I have spoken to tell me that 120 on my meter is fine and 125 is acceptable. But that is at the top end of everything you have been told? So who is running the asylum?

Comment by Hana Rous on April 11, 2012 at 6:06am

All meter used in Britain have been Plasma meters for some time.
Nevertheless, Sureely the ONLY sane TARGET is NORMAL blood glucose. Pity so few medics know what that is. On a survey, a couple of years ago, I asked a few "front-liners" including a triage nurse, what normal glucose is. All of them quoted the diabetes UK figures of 4 - 7 [72 - 126] Bernstein gives 4.7 [85] as the normal. My meter leaflet gives a figure of around 5[90]. As I've written before, I don't expect everyone to hit the target all the time, but aiming for it is sensible. I know many diabetics who happily aim for "up tp 7" [126]. Some of these are motivated people who would aim for 5 [90] if they knew to.

Comment by Hana Rous on April 11, 2012 at 5:44am

Here in Britain with the NHS, Stable T2s are discouraged from self testing. the real reason is cost, butpatients are told that testing leads to depression and anxiety and sore fingers. I pay for my own supplies [out of my ungenerous pension] and have trouble getting any strips prescribed, even with new driving regs which say I should test before any drive and every 2 hours on a long journey. I'm also supposed to cqarry glucose in the car. Since I use mainly diet plus 2 x 500mg Metformin per day, I'm not really subject to hypos and I suppose the regs probably don't apply to me, but I'd not like to have to contest it in a court. i have a pack of glucose in the car, but certainly don't test every time I drive. I don't have enough strips for that. My way round the probem is to WALK locally and use the bus for medium journeys. Fortunately, we have an excellent public transport service here in Reading.

Comment by JaninaWalker on April 10, 2012 at 7:28pm

Here is the most succinct explanation
So the old range we were given was 80-120 and now it is 90-130, but I am saying it is not making things easier for us, but just more accurate. They didn't raise the range so it could be easier to achieve.

Comment by Natalie ._c- on April 10, 2012 at 6:49pm

Janina, meters used to read in whole blood numbers, which are lower than plasma numbers. So they added in an algorithm to make meters read as if it were plasma to make it easier to compare lab readings to meter readings. That makes it easier to check your meter against the lab reading to make sure your meter is functioning adequately. Is there any other reason that concerns you that I'm not aware of?

Comment by JaninaWalker on April 10, 2012 at 4:55pm

Put the below into a search engine and you will see why they raised the hoped for range.....it was not to make things easier. Try this in google.....
whole blood vs plasma glucose levels


Members (461)




From the Diabetes Hands Foundation blog...

Diabetes Among Hispanics: We’re not all the same

US Hispanics are often portrayed in the press as a single, monolithic group. But anyone who has spent any time in San Francisco’s Mission District or the Bronx can tell you, we’re not all the same. Now we’re finding out Read on! →

Diabetes entre los hispanos: no somos todos iguales

Traducido por Mila Ferrer.    A menudo los Hispanos en Estados Unidos son retratados en la prensa como un solo grupo, monolítico. Pero cualquiera que haya pasado algún tiempo en el  Mission District de San Francisco o el Bronx se Read on! →

Diabetes Hands Foundation Team


Manny Hernandez
(Co-Founder, Editor, has LADA)

Emily Coles
(Head of Communities, has type 1)

Mila Ferrer
(EsTuDiabetes Community Manager, mother of a child with type 1)

Mike Lawson
(Head of Experience, has type 1)

Corinna Cornejo
(Development Manager, has type 2)

Desiree Johnson  (Administrative and Programs Assistant, has type 1)


Lead Administrator

Bradford (has type 1)


Lorraine (mother of type 1)
Marie B (has type 1)

Brian (bsc) (has type 2)

Gary (has type 2)

David (dns) (type 2)


LIKE us on Facebook

Spread the word


This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here.

© 2014   A community of people touched by diabetes, run by the Diabetes Hands Foundation.

Badges  |  Contact Us  |  Terms of Service