My DexCom 7+ stats always correlated very well with my A1C. Not this time.

Before:
3 months mean BG: 95 mg/dl
3 months SD: 27
A1C: 4.6%

Now:
3 months mean BG: 94 mg/dl
3 months SD: 26
A1C: 5.7%

I wonder what happened. The only change that I can think of is that I switched to the butterfly BG strips and used them with the OmniPod PDM.

Abbott will overnight me a BG meter that is approved for the butterfly strips. I am done with taking chances.

Views: 1967

Replies to This Discussion

Wow, Helmut - that's crazy! Please let us know how the new meter works out for you...I'm very curious!

While I am waiting for the new BG meter I started to take 5 BG tests from the same big blood drop during Dexcom calibration:

Tests are done with

1) OneTouch Ultra Mini
2) FreeStyle Flash with previous generation strips
3) OmniPod PDM with previous generation strips
4) FreeStyle Flash with butterfly strips
5) OmniPod PDM with butterfly strips

Results in the same order:

This morning: 89/91/95/73/75
This evening: 96/93/95/78/72

They included a Freestyle Freedom in the box with my PDM until the strips are approved in the PDM.
It will be interesting to see what they send you....the butterfly strips are approved in the Flash, so my guess is the new meter will not be too different.

I just got my PDM/pods yesterday. I'm a new Omnipod user starting this weekend. Wondered why the Freestyle was in there too. Thanks for the info, it makes sense now.

My Freestyle Freedom is not much better than the PDM. My Freestyle Freedom reads low too.

Interesting numbers. But looking at those it seems the problem is the new strips and not the PDM. Quite a difference.

I got a FreeStyle FREEDOM meter from Abbott. The first result is not promising.

1) OneTouch Ultra Mini
2) FreeStyle Flash with previous generation strips
3) OmniPod PDM with previous generation strips
4) FreeStyle Flash with butterfly strips
5) OmniPod PDM with butterfly strips
6) FreeStyle FREEDOM with butterfly strips

155/155/157/129/125/133

For the next test I will use butterfly strips from a different box with a different expiration date.

I just googled "freestyle butterfly reading low". The first result reads:

"So I'm seeing a difference of 20% and I am definitely not satisfied with that!"

link

Helmut,

If you check the original thread from over a year ago I was the person that started this thread and contacted Insulet. Despite everyone telling me that they were fine my data is very similar to your data.

Unfortunately, Insulet chose the wrong partner in Abbott first they abandon the Navigator and now this whole strip mess. I am hoping they put a different brand meter in the next PDM. By Abbott no longer making the old style strips they are saying screw you to PDM customers. I have spoken to them many times and they say it is a shortage which is a JOKE. I heard the same line from them regarding the Navigator and they strung us along and then discontinued the product. It is clear by their actions they do NOT care about customers.

Insulet is stuck here and the best people like us can do is carry a separate meter which is a pain.

I know others have had success with the new strips but you are not crazy they do not work for me either.

So much for making diabetes a smaller part of my life.

Be well...

Seth, I agree 100%.

A fellow TU member changed the code on his PDM from 16 to 12 to improve accuracy.

I compared previous generation strips and butterfly strips with different code settings for the butterfly strips to find my magic number. My magic number for the butterfly strips is 18.

Then I came up with an even better method for finding the magic number: I used control solution. Typical results were:

16: 80 mg/dl
17: 90 mg/dl
18: 100 mg/dl
19: 110 mg/dl

I tested with 8 different lots with different expiration dates. The results were pretty consistent.
My old strips tested at 100 mg/dl. The ideal result would be 104 mg/dl.

So are you using 18 now with the butterfuly strips? From the preceding tests it appears that the butterfuly strips are reading uniformly low...and maybe the 18 set will correct this bias? Thanks for all this helpful information. Mike.

RSS

Advertisement



REsources

From the Diabetes Hands Foundation blog...

How do you measure the work of volunteers?

329,040 minutes, 329,040 moments so dear. 329,040 minutes — How do you measure, measure volunteers? In smileys, in tears shed, in counsel, in cups of coffee. In units, in carb counts, in laughter, in strife. In 329,040 minutes – how …
Continue Reading

DHF Expands Board of Advisors

Diabetes Hands Foundation has always relied on partners and advisors to increase its understanding of the diabetes space, in order to better serve people touched by diabetes. Today this is as true as ever, as we proudly announce the expansion …
Continue Reading

TuDiabetes Team

DHF STAFF

Manny Hernandez
(Co-Founder, Editor, has LADA)

Emily Coles
(Head of Communities, has type 1)

Emily Walton
(Business Manager)

Mike Lawson
(Head of Experience, has type 1)

Corinna Cornejo
(Development Manager, has type 2)

Heather Gabel
(Administrative and Programs Assistant, has type 1)

DHF VOLUNTEERS


Lead Administrator
Bradford (has type 1)

Administrators
Lorraine (mother of type 1)
Marie B (has type 1)

Teena (has type 2)

Brian (bsc) (has type 2)

jrtpup (has type 1)

 

LIKE us on Facebook

Spread the word

Loading…

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here.

© 2013   A community of people touched by diabetes, run by the Diabetes Hands Foundation.

Badges  |  Contact Us  |  Terms of Service