Why I don't want a CGM
I've been doing this diabetes thing myself for about 1.5 years now. I've lived with my mom's own brittle T1 diabetes for the 22.5 years that preceeded my own diagnosis. I know all about fluctuating sugars and the benefits of knowing where you're at. Even so, there are a host of reasons that I'm not stressing my lack of CGM right now, nor am I too worried about jumping on the bandwagon in the near future.
1. I'm (generally) predictably in control - I'm getting pretty good at dancing the dance and being able to gauge the outcome. Maybe that's a factor of my age, my diet, my own continued insulin production, or luck. I don't know, but it's working well for me now, so I'm gonna go with it.
2. The variability of accuracy worries me - I hear stories. Sometimes they are spot on, sometimes they are 200 points off. I understand that they are going to have accuracy issues, just like conventional meters do, but those issues would aggravate me, and I see no reason to add such aggravation to my daily routine right now.
3. I'm not having babies anytime soon - I don't need to be in such religiously tight control for procreation purposes.
4. I don't want to deal with alarms, especially if they are potentially incorrect or about lost sensors.
5. I don't have any problems with hypo unawareness or not waking up when I'm low.
6. I don't want to give my diabetes any bigger a stake in my life right now - I think this is the main reason I don't want to sign up for a CGM. There's a certain danger for obsession that I think would come with my having access to my BG numbers every five minutes. That's just how I am. Though a CGM would certainly keep me more informed about what my BG is doing and maybe even why it's doing that, I do not want to give diabetes the invitation to dominate my thoughts right now. Control can go either way, and I'd like to remain the one in power.
I can't stress this enough, THIS IS AN ENTIRELY PERSONAL DECISION AND RATIONALIZATION BASED ON MY OWN EXPERIENCE. I'm sure I'll change my tune in a few years. I'm sure I'll eat my words eventually, but for right now, I'm happy to step to the back of the line and let Blue Cross pay for everyone who is ready for the technology.
-
Comment by Windy on January 21, 2008 at 3:40pm -
Ooh, I have Blue Cross, does this mean they are gonna pay for my CGM? Lizzie, you don't have to defend your decision. I'm sure, just like the pumps have, the CGM will make strides over the next several years and models. I have a 2020 too... don't you just love it? I do struggle with hypo unawareness, so the CGMS is great for me. I do get frustrated when the accuracy gets off once in a while though, so I understand those concerns!! Glad your staying in control!! Cheers!
-
Comment by Karen on January 21, 2008 at 5:08pm -
Lizzie,
If you have read any of my posts, you have seen my long fight for the CGM and I started using it two weeks ago and all you have stated above I am finding very true for me, not too happy about it, but you are so right on most of your comments.
-
Comment by Scott Strumello on September 8, 2008 at 5:14am -
Lizzie,
As Windy noted, CGM systems are still in first or second generation, and there are indeed a number of issues which need to be resolved before they are equivalent. However, just because a doctor recommends the latest technology doesn't mean you should necessarily jump to get it ... most claims of improved glycemic control are usually unsubstantiated in the larger patient population. A case in point is insulin pumps. Virtually ALL of the clinical literature published on pumps demonstrate that improvement is relative to your starting point. This means if you're starting with horrific glycemic control, you are likely to see the greatest benefit of pumping, while those with already good control seldom see much improvement (if any at all). I found wearing a pump to be not worth the time, money and effort, and returned to MDI and have never regretted that decision. But there is a presumption that new, costly technology must somehow improve care and control even if the presumption is unsubstantiated. You should tell your endo the points you raised here, and see how he/she responds. In many cases, the offer follows an all-expense paid golf weekend sponsored by the manufacturer, but clearly until it is universally covered by insurance, if you don't need it and don't want it, it makes no sense to pursue getting it!
Comment
Advertisement
REsources
Groups
From the Diabetes Hands Foundation blog...
How do you measure the work of volunteers?
329,040 minutes, 329,040 moments so dear. 329,040 minutes — How do you measure, measure volunteers? In smileys, in tears shed, in counsel, in cups of coffee. In units, in carb counts, in laughter, in strife. In 329,040 minutes – how …Continue Reading
DHF Expands Board of Advisors
Diabetes Hands Foundation has always relied on partners and advisors to increase its understanding of the diabetes space, in order to better serve people touched by diabetes. Today this is as true as ever, as we proudly announce the expansion …Continue Reading
TuDiabetes Team
DHF STAFF
 Manny Hernandez(Co-Founder, Editor, has LADA)
|
DHF VOLUNTEERS
Lead Administrator
 Bradford (has type 1) |
Administrators
 Lorraine (mother of type 1) |
 Marie B (has type 1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIKE us on Facebook
Spread the word
This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here.
© 2013 A community of people touched by diabetes, run by the Diabetes Hands Foundation.
You need to be a member of Diabetes community by Diabetes Hands Foundation: TuDiabetes to add comments!
Join Diabetes community by Diabetes Hands Foundation: TuDiabetes