I was very excited to get the new Bayer Contour USB Glucometer. It was replacing my Abbott FreeStyle Lite meter. So When I started using it, I ran the Control Solution and it checked out OK. I then measured my BG on the new Contour and my old FreeStyle and was surprised to see the readings were different by around 60 points! So I have been doing this for two days and the two meters still vary widely. Now I'm confused as I don't know which reading to trust. Anybody have a solution to this? Thanks.

Views: 109

Comment by Jim Roach on February 7, 2010 at 6:26pm
All I have to say is that is scary. We have to trust these devices fro our well being. We use those numbers to make important decisions regarding our diet and doseages yet they dont appear to be that accurate. What is one to do!!!!!!
Comment by Gerri on February 7, 2010 at 6:58pm
They're all allowed to be off by +-20%, so it's perplexing. My former One Touch is always lower than my current Accu-Chek.

I took several meters to the lab when I had blood tests done. I checked them against the lab results to see which one was closest. It's not a perfect test, but it helped some.
Comment by The Diabetic Welfare Queen on February 7, 2010 at 7:34pm
When I first started with my glucose meters, I had a One Touch Ultra Mini, and a Bayer Breeze2. The One Touch Ultra Mini was always much, much lower... but even though the Breeze2 was always about higher, it was always the ones closest to lab results... so I use that one, instead.
Comment by Krystal Parker on February 7, 2010 at 9:14pm
i have had this happen to me. my one touch mini always runs higher than my ultra smart. i had them checked against my lab test and the mini is closest. i discussed this with my doc and he said they are a very useful tool but still just a tool and sometimes you still need to go by how you feel. if you feel low and your meter say 75 treat it because you meter may be off. unfortunately i dont feel the lows much anymore so i must rely totally on my meter and my wonderful pups who detect my hypos without fail when i am home. hope this helps
Comment by Holger Schmeken on February 8, 2010 at 2:08am
This difference is too high (+/- 20 is normal, from meter to meter, from test strip to test strip). One of these devices must have a malfunction. A very good cross check is to test with both devices when lab tests are done. In the mean time: what happens when you use the control solution on the old meter? Is it in range?
Comment by Pauly on February 8, 2010 at 8:44am
Take 5 tests right in a row with both meters. If you have a difference of more than 20 points on one of the meters complain to the meter company. You have bad strips or a faulty meter. Many of the strips are the problem. My meters are within 20 like Holger said.
Comment by Charles Boesel on February 8, 2010 at 3:52pm
Well thanks for all the feedback. I didn't know about the +/- 20. I threw the Freestyle away as it was the furthest out of whack. Now I just have the Bayer Contour and Bayer Contour USB and they are within 3 points of each other, so I am satisfied that they are relatively accurate. One thing about the Freestyle that bothered me was it seems the sample size varied, while the Bayer strips always use the same amount. Problem is I have 150 Freestyle test strips left over now.
Comment by Charles Boesel on February 8, 2010 at 4:04pm
I just did a test on the remaining Freestyle and my 2 Contours. The Freestyle read 225 and the Contours read 175 and 176. So I threw that last Freestyle away, along with 150 test strips (yikes). No matter how many times I test them, both Freestyles were always high and out of whack. Yet they passed the control solution tests. GO figure. The meters are cheap enough that I'm not going to fret over it. But I'm not going to use another Freestyle meter again.
Comment by Holger Schmeken on February 9, 2010 at 4:41pm
I think your decision is right. How old is the Freestyle now? It could be related to the age of the device. I have read a study that found a correlation between meter age and its accuracy.

Please remember: your higher Freestyle forced you to tighter control. Ha Ha, I am just joking.
Comment by Paul Patten on February 10, 2010 at 6:48am
The differene you have observed may be in the +/-20% range. Suppose your actual glucose was 200 ml/dl, then 20% would be a difference of 40 mg/dl on either side of 200 or a range of values from 160 to 240. So all of your readings might have been within the error specifications. Also, the blood glucose may have been changing rapidly. It is true that some brands of meters will tend to read higher than others, so that one brand might be better for type 2's who are trying to lower glucose, but do not need to be concerned as much about hypoglycemia because of the type of medication they have. That same brand might not be good for a insulin dependent person who has hypoglycemic unawareness.

Comment

You need to be a member of Diabetes community by Diabetes Hands Foundation: TuDiabetes to add comments!

Join Diabetes community by Diabetes Hands Foundation: TuDiabetes

Advertisement



REsources

From the Diabetes Hands Foundation blog...

Together, We Can Get Diabetes Co-Stars to 10,000 Views!

Above is a photo of Diabetes Hands Foundation’s own Manny Hernandez with the stars of the Diabetes Co-Stars Video, “Strength in Numbers.” In case you haven’t heard the news yet, there is a new video making it’s way through the …
Continue Reading

Congratulations Diabetes Advocates Scholarship Recipients!

The Diabetes Hands Foundation and Diabetes Advocates Program is proud to announce and congratulate the members of DA who were granted scholarships to attend diabetes conferences in 2013! Thanks to a generous grant from Novo Nordisk, in 2013 we were …
Continue Reading

TuDiabetes Team

DHF STAFF

Manny Hernandez
(Co-Founder, Editor, has LADA)

Emily Coles
(Head of Communities, has type 1)

Emily Walton
(Business Manager)

Mike Lawson
(Head of Experience, has type 1)

Corinna Cornejo
(Development Manager, has type 2)

Heather Gabel
(Administrative and Programs Assistant, has type 1)

DHF VOLUNTEERS


Lead Administrator
Bradford (has type 1)

Administrators
Lorraine (mother of type 1)
Marie B (has type 1)

Teena (has type 2)

Brian (bsc) (has type 2)

jrtpup (has type 1)

 

LIKE us on Facebook

Spread the word

Loading…

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here.

© 2013   A community of people touched by diabetes, run by the Diabetes Hands Foundation.

Badges  |  Contact Us  |  Terms of Service