HELP!!! I want to love my CGM but I'm learning to hate it!

I put on a Dexcom 7 CGM almost a week ago. It's the first time I've worn a CGM. I've toyed with the idea for a year. I don't wear an insulin pump - never have - but I thought a CGM could be a real help. I don't wear a pump because I'm very disciplined, and with frequent testing and injections my A1c stays in the high 5s. Of course that also means I have my fair share of lows: that's where the CGM comes in. All I want it to do (am still wearing it, till the sensor stops) was catch the lows before they happen, and the highs too, although I don't have many of those.

But my CGM is catching nothing. I've had 4 lows, none of which it caught. While I was in the 50s, it was 123, 94, 88 and something else I'm too disgusted to remember. And before you think I'm not doing something right, I'm calibrating it at least 3x/day and it never leaves my body or bed, including the times it tells me I'm out of range! Sometimes, admittedly, it's within 5 points of my meter, then I love it, and worse yet begin to trust it, because more often it's 20 points, 30 points, 40 points away. Then there's the lag time. Even if I'm going up or down quickly it's on 20 minute time delay.

So, after my 6 day experience I'm pretty sure this is not for me - not until they make the CGM parrot my meter in real time. That said, I'm dying to know whether you also hated your experience with the CGM, and why, or are one of its diehard fans, and why???

Views: 40

Tags: 7, CGM, Dexcom, diabetes, insulin, pump, tracking

Comment by Brian (bsc) on July 28, 2011 at 5:14am
Maybe the CGM doesn't work for you. But it may also be true that it gets better with practice. What I really mean is that over time you may become more effective at using the CGM. You perhaps get better at the whole sensor thing, insertion and placement. Perhaps you get better at knowing when and how often to calibrate.

I know I have a pretty thick head. Sometimes it can take me a while to really get things and realize their potential. Maybe you should just soldier on and give it every ounce of chance to work. After all, it would really be a shame to find that you went through all this trouble, then gave it up as not working only to find out after that that you made some little mistake with the sensor or something. And when you weigh the potential benefits of reducing lows against the mild ongoing hassle of the CGM, it does see like it makes sense to let the experiment run longer.
Comment by Scott E on July 28, 2011 at 5:58am
When I started my CGM (Medtronic... and from what I've read on here, Dexcom is so much better!) my CDE asked me to make one promise: be willing to try it for 30 days -- through one box of sensors -- before making the decision to give up. Many people give up too soon because of bad results, "nuisance alarms", insertion difficulties or other reasons. It really takes a bit of skill, talent, and patience to use it.

My advice to you is this: be careful about the timing of your calibrations (when BG is relatively flat), and give it 30 days. (Also, since lows from long-acting insulin may occur faster than lows from pumping rapid-acting, set your alarm-rates a bit more conservatively. Usually a 'Low predicted' means you're already low)
Comment by amy mercer on July 29, 2011 at 9:22am
I don't wear a CGM partly because of the cost, but also because I don't like wearing medical equipment on my body. However, I feel like I can relate to your situation. I was talked into trying the pump ten years ago and gave up after 3 days because I was frustrated with its complexity, but also because I wasn't ready. Two years ago I was ready and wore the omnipod for a period of time until it became too expensive. It was a love/hate relationship, but I stuck with it because I was ready.

Maybe you're just not ready?
Comment by Riva Greenberg on July 29, 2011 at 9:34am
I think I'm ready, I've pondered this for about a year. I also think either the spread of numbers between my meter and the CGM is too often too big to be of much use. Since I'm only doing a trial with one sensor, unfortunately, I can't tell whether this sensor just isn't reading the intestinal fluid as well as another might, so I understand when people say try it for a month, but I don't have that option with this trial.


You need to be a member of Diabetes community by Diabetes Hands Foundation: TuDiabetes to add comments!

Join Diabetes community by Diabetes Hands Foundation: TuDiabetes



From the Diabetes Hands Foundation blog...

DHF receives $200,000 grant from Novo Nordisk

Grant given to support programs aimed at bringing together people touched by diabetes for positive change BERKELEY, CA: December 4, 2014 – Diabetes Hands Foundation (DHF) has received a grant of US$200,000 from Novo Nordisk to support programs aimed at Read on! →

Guest Post: World Diabetes Day 2014 on Twitter… sifting through the data

At Symplur we track hashtags, keywords, user accounts, and pretty much anything else on Twitter that has to do with healthcare. We collect the data and then build countless ways to slice it up so that we’re able to better Read on! →

Diabetes Hands Foundation Team


Manny Hernandez
(Co-Founder, Editor, has LADA)

Emily Coles
(Head of Communities, has type 1)

Mila Ferrer
(EsTuDiabetes Community Manager, mother of a child with type 1)

Mike Lawson
(Head of Experience, has type 1)

Corinna Cornejo
(Development Manager, has type 2)

Desiree Johnson  (Administrative and Programs Assistant, has type 1)


Lead Administrator

Brian (bsc) (has type 2)


Lorraine (mother of type 1)
Marie B (has type 1)

DanP (has Type 1)

Gary (has type 2)

David (has type 2)


LIKE us on Facebook

Spread the word


This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here.

© 2014   A community of people touched by diabetes, run by the Diabetes Hands Foundation.

Badges  |  Contact Us  |  Terms of Service