New food labels

 

Today the US Federal Government is likely to announce the adoption of the first set of new food labels in over 20 years. The implications for the food industry and consumers are amazing. This material is largely scanned from the online Washington Post article filed today February 27, 2014 by Ariana Eunjung Cha. The website to view the article is as follows:


http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/food-labels-t...

According to Cha, the new labels will take years to be fully implemented includes several changes. These generally include more legitimate serving sizes (ie..larger), greater importance of sugar content, less emphasis on fat and an overall increased emphasis on calories.

For sugar the FDA intends to classify all sugar the same. Whether it be natural, or added sugar the two will be treated the same. According to the “Food industry groups have said that natural sugar and added sugar are chemically identical and that the body doesn’t differentiate between the two, so it makes little sense to break them out in this manner on labels” (Unnamed source as quoted by Cha, 2014).

Here is an example of the new labels:

Source (Washington Post August 26)

 

The belief is that American’s consume too much sugar and the new labels are designed to inform consumers and reduce that reliance on sugar as a food ingredient.

 

“Advocates of this change say that people will no longer have to do a lot of math to understand how many calories they are consuming. Of the 157 food types that are currently covered, the Food and Drug Administration is proposing to change the serving size for 17 percent of them. For instance, the serving size for ice cream, now half a cup, would become one cup” (Cha, 2014). 

 

In reality except for serving size, there is likely little difference for most diabetics.  Most of us are intense label readers, and we tend to have focused on the content of labels for years.  Serving size however is likely to be a big change.  Finally more realistic serving sizes will likely give us a better chance to interpret the meaning of the labels.

 

  

References

 

Cha, Ariana Eunjung. (2014). Nutrition labels to get first makeover in 20 years with new emphasis on calories, sugar, Washington Post.

-30-

rick

Views: 103

Comment by Manny Hernandez on February 27, 2014 at 5:57am

Thanks for sharing this, Rick!! I am SO glad to read that serving sizes, even if it's just for 17% of food types, will be updated: though I am an engineer, I have always found fractions in serving sizes to be a recipe for failure in carb counting.

I agree with you that most of the new changes, except for updated serving sizes, will affect PWD dramatically. It seems to me like Proposal 1 will be best for most people, if nothing else, because of the slightly larger font size.

Do you know if there is an open docket for this, so that people can offer comments? If so, we should, in order to make our voices heard.

Comment by Marie B on February 27, 2014 at 6:14am

I like proposal 1 too. it's easier to read. people that read labels carefully are looking for specific info anyway (for me, it's about the carbs and the serving size) so proposal 2's "avoid too much" and "get enough" areas just make the label too cluttered for me.

the fractions can be maddening. like the nutritionals for a pizza shell that say "one fifth of the pizza is a serving size" in this discussion on wacky food labels. How do you cut a round pizza into 5 portions?

Comment by Manny Hernandez on February 27, 2014 at 6:32am
Reply from FDA about docket:
Comment by shoshana27 on February 27, 2014 at 6:44am

important things on food labels are CARBOHYDRATE- SERVING SIZE & NO ARTIFICIAL ANYTHING

Comment by Stoner on February 27, 2014 at 8:27am

Maybe it is just me. In the proposal three, the dietary fiber is far down from the the carbohydrate. Depending on how much fiber is in a serving size, I sometimes subtract the fiber from the carbohydrate. It is easy to do when it is right there, but in proposal three we will have to "hunt" for it.

Thanks Rick for sharing this information with us. I will be glad to write them a comment when the link is provided.

Comment by Shawnmarie on February 27, 2014 at 10:45am

This has been bugging me since I noticed this morning on the FDA website. The sample of a current label shows 8g of fat, but only 40 calories from fat. Shouldn't it be 72 calories? I just tweeted the FDA about it. Doesn't give me much confidence in their overall accuracy, old or new.

Comment by shoshana27 on February 28, 2014 at 5:40am

i also subtract the fiber

Comment

You need to be a member of Diabetes community by Diabetes Hands Foundation: TuDiabetes to add comments!

Join Diabetes community by Diabetes Hands Foundation: TuDiabetes

Advertisement



REsources

From the Diabetes Hands Foundation blog...

#OpposeAB1893: California Bill that Burdens People with Diabetes on Insulin

A couple of days ago I learned that the California State Assembly is considering AB-1893 Sharps waste, which in (if approved) will mandate that: “Sharps sold to the general public in California shall be sold with a sharps waste container Read on! →

FDA Docket Extended! We Need You.

If you are new to diabetes advocacy in the traditional sense of the word, you may be thinking, “What the heck is a docket!?” I certainly was the first twenty times I heard it (yes it took that long). For Read on! →

Diabetes Hands Foundation Team

DHF TEAM

Manny Hernandez
(Co-Founder, Editor, has LADA)

Emily Coles
(Head of Communities, has type 1)

Mila Ferrer
(EsTuDiabetes Community Manager, mother of a child with type 1)

Mike Lawson
(Head of Experience, has type 1)

Corinna Cornejo
(Development Manager, has type 2)

Heather Gabel
(Administrative and Programs Assistant, has type 1)

DHF VOLUNTEERS


Lead Administrator
Bradford (has type 1)

Administrators
Lorraine (mother of type 1)
Marie B (has type 1)

Brian (bsc) (has type 2)

Gary (has type 2)

David (dns) (type 2)

 

LIKE us on Facebook

Spread the word

Loading…

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here.

© 2014   A community of people touched by diabetes, run by the Diabetes Hands Foundation.

Badges  |  Contact Us  |  Terms of Service